Everything You Need to Know about Intel's New Z68 Chipset
Intel’s new Z68 chipset brings SSD caching and switchable graphics
On the surface, it’s easy to shrug your shoulders and say “meh” at Intel’s new Z68 chipset.
It doesn’t, for example, add any more than the two SATA 6GB/s ports that the P67 had nor does it add native USB 3.0. The single x16 PCI-E 2.0 isn’t improved either (nor can it be because those are within the CPU). But that’s doesn't mean the Z68 isn't an important step forward.
In fact, the improvements it brings to the table are actually uniquely compelling. The top new features are:
1) The ability to overclock the graphics core in the Sandy Bridge CPU.
2) An Identity Protection Technology feature that essentially integrates a hardware token in to the PC.
3) Optional support for switching graphics between a discrete GPU and the integrated graphics processor in Sandy Bridge.
4) SSD caching that greatly improves the responsiveness of a system.
We’ll discuss them in order as introduced:
While the Sandy Bridge graphics core is much improved, enthusiasts are unlikey to ever need to overclock it as no amount of overclocking will make it supersede a discrete graphics card for gaming. So, yay, you can overclock the graphics processor, but meh, who cares?
We’re not so bearish on IPT. Much like those key fobs that people carry that generate random numbers, the capability now exists in a consumer chipset and processor. Up until now though, IPT has only been offered in the Q67 chipset aimed at boring corporate boxes. With Z68, IPT could hopefully mitigate some hacking and identity theft situations. Valve has already said that it will support IPT to help prevent account hijacking.
Of more interest to consumers is the ability to switch between integrated and discrete graphics. On P67, even though all Sandy Bridge chips included a fairly powerful graphics processor, end users had no access to it because the P67 chipset had no output — those were only available on the H and Q-series chipsets. With Z68, Intel now includes the Flexible Display Interface that will connect from the processor graphics to the Z68 chipset. Some boards that we’ve seen, such as the Asus P8Z68-V Pro include both DVI and HDMI ports so you can run just integrated if you want to.
But here’s where it gets interesting – board vendors are also including Lucidlogix’s Virtu. Virtu lets you virtualize either of the GPUs. There are two modes available: i-mode and d-mode.
In i-mode, you set the board to initialize the integrated graphics port first in the UEFI. Then you connect your monitor to the motherboard’s graphics port. You’ll need to install graphics drivers for both the Intel integrated part and the discrete part. For our testing, we used a GeForce GTX 580 card. Lucid actually says the best results will come from an ATI card, but we opted for the nVidia card to see how much of a monkey wrench we could throw in it. For a just out of beta product it surprisingly worked well. Would we run it in this mode? Probably not, at least at this point.
When running in i-mode, you are primarily using your integrated graphics and only kicking on the discrete card for gaming. The main sticking point here is that you’ll need Lucid to create profiles for any game that you run in the Virtu mode. Most gamers that we know can’t wait that long when a new game is released. The other issue is power savings. As one of the key points of i-mode you'll likely see only moderate to minimal savings. That’s because unlike a mobile solution’s switchable graphics, the discrete card doesn’t completely power down. Even idling, today’s beefy graphics cards still drink too much power. We’d prefer it if vendors could find a way to power down the discrete card when not in use. I-mode is also currently incompatible with dual-GPU cards and SLI too.

We used an Asus P8Z68-V Pro board for our testing
The Asus P8PZ68-V Pro will also support a similar technology from Nvidia called Synergy. At press time, it wasn’t ready for consumption but leaks on the web indicate the technology will be free (Lucid charges board vendors for Virtu) and it will leverage the profiles Nvidia has already developed for its Optimus technology on laptops.
Virtu has a second mode available that’s likely to be more handy: d-mode. In this mode, you set the UEFI to boot to initialize the PCI-E graphics adapter first and hook the monitor up to a port on the graphics card. In this mode, the discrete graphics card is in control and any game you run will run without the need for profiles to be created by Lucid. So what would ever use d-mode for? To access the Quick Sync technology in Sandy Bridge. Yes, Sandy Bridge’s graphics performance will never best a serious GPU, but believe it or not, the transistors that Intel has dedicated in Sandy Bridge for encoding and transcoding are mean mothers. How mean?
We took an Asus P8Z68-V Pro board, plugged in a Core i7-2600K, 8GB of DDR3/1333, a 1TB Western Digital Black drive and a GeForce GTX 580 card. Running in d-mode, we used CyberLink’s MediaEspresso 6.5 to transcode a single VOB file to a generic WMV file suitable for playback on an HTC smart phone. Using the GeForce GTX 580 card took 142 seconds. We then used Virtu to allow us to access the QuickSync mode on the Core i7-2600K chip which took 109 seconds. That’s about a 30 percent faster for the integrated grapics. Now think about a transcode that would take three hours. Would you rather use the GeForce GTX 580 or the Core i7-2600K’s Quick Sync?

Lucid’s Virtu control panel lets you switch on the fly between the discrete card or the onboard graphics.
The coolest new feature of the Z68 isn’t switchable graphics or anti-hacking features though, it’s going to be the Smart Response Technology that’s built into the, umm, Rapid Storage Technology drivers (Intel, who seriously comes up with these names?).
SRT allows the Z68 chipset to use an SSD to cache often used data from a hard disk. This, in theory, offers up to a 4x improvement in performance over a hard disk drive alone.
Setting up SRT
Normally, setting up new technology is pretty self explanatory. That’s not the case with the SRT. With Intel’s new 20GB Larsen Creek in one hand, and a 1TB 7,200 RPM Western Digital Caviar Black drive in the other, we weren’t sure how to set up SRT initially. The process is actually quite simple. All you have to do is attach both drives to the board – an Asus P8Z68 V Pro board. Boot the system and go into the UEFI and set the Intel controller from its default of AHCI to RAID. Now boot to your install disc and install Windows 7 to the hard drive as normal. You can’t enable the SRT until after you’ve installed all of the drivers. Once you do, you simply go to the RST driver and click on the Accelerate button.

From there, you select the drive you want to use as the cache drive, pick the disk you want to accelerate (normally C:) and then pick the mode: Either enhanced or maximized.

Enhanced is the safer of the two and ensures that all data is written to the HDD. In this mode, read performance is improved but write performance will be no better than the hard drive in use. Think of Maximized mode as write caching. Data is written to the SSD first and then synced to the hard disk as time allows. If there is a power outage, or a blue screen before all of the data can be synced – poof your data is gone. The maximized mode, however, does offer write times close to what the SSD should be able to write to.
Ideally, SRT is intended for people who can’t afford massive 240GB SSDs but want “SSD-like” performance. Using SRT, these folks can buy smaller SSDs and get that SSD-feel. In fact, Intel is hawking its new Larsen Creek SSD to these people. A 20GB SSD, the 311-series drive offers reads up to 190MB/s and writes up to 100MB/s all for $110.
For our testing, we used the aforementioned Asus P8Z68-V Pro board outfitted with a Core i7-2600K, 8GB of DDR3/1333, a GeForce GTX 580 and a 1TB Western Digital Caviar Black. We used 64-bit Windows 7 Professional with SP1 installed and latest Nvidia drivers available. We ran PC Mark Vantage 64-bit and CrystalDisk 3.01 with just the 1TB drive initially. We then turned on SRT in maximized mode using the 20GB Larsen Creek Intel SSD and reran both tests.
We didn’t want to be gated by the Intel drive so we also used OCZ’s Kick-Ass 240GB Vertex 3 in the mix. We ran the same tests using the Vertex 3 in Maximized mode and Enhanced mode. Since the Vertex 3 is SATA 6Gb/s, we also made sure it was running off of the Intel PCH’s SATA 6GB/s controller. One thing to know: the SRT mode has a maximum cache size of 64GB. The rest of the space on the SSD can then be partitioned into a separate drive. For this test, we opted for the 64GB partition which could contribute to the performance difference. We suspect, however, that’s really the exemplary performance of the Vertex 3 that’s really to be credited.
The results speak for themselves.


The hard drive trace tests in PC Mark Vantage as well as the synthetic tests in CrystalMark show that the SRT mode is pretty phenomenal. The best results came from the very fast and very expensive OCZ Vertex 3. But even the $110 Intel SSD yields very good results. You can’t benchmark “OS feel” but we can tell you that using the 1TB 7,200 RPM drive as our primary device – even with 8GB of RAM and the Core i7-2600K – was teeth gnashing slow. We’ve just forgotten how slow hard drives are compared to SSDs. With SRT and the Intel drive in place, the drive noise was greatly reduced as we no longer had to listen to the heads clattering all over the platter and it “felt” faster.
To get a feel for how much you give up in maximized vs. enhanced modes, we ran the Vertex 3 in both modes. As expected, generally the write speeds suffer greatly in enhanced mode while read speeds are mostly intact.


![]()
sahilgarg
January 18, 2012 at 9:23pm
The article is actually the sweetest topic on this related issue.current health articles||personal finance articles
![]()
sahilgarg
January 10, 2012 at 9:25pm
I really increased my knowledge after read your post which will be beneficial for me.article submission|| article submission services
![]()
sahab12
January 09, 2012 at 10:21pm
Oh! Great, these kinds of sites are really helpful for searching good and useful stuff , thanks a lot for sharing this one. travel news articles
![]()
Gunslinger11b
December 31, 2011 at 1:24am
I just built a new system with an Asus P8Z68-V Pro board, a 1TB hard drive and a 64GB SSD. Since I'm new to SRT I didn't set the SATA mode to RAID before I installed Windows 7 Home Premium. When I try to set SATA mode to RAID now Windows won't boot. Is there a way to set up SRT short of an operating system reinstall?
![]()
sahilgarg
December 05, 2011 at 2:26am
Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading your articles. This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work!California Dui Lawyers
![]()
ALTRego
October 30, 2011 at 2:22pm
Hir Gordon, Thank you for the excellent review of the Z68 chipset and features. I was wondering if you could test the SRT feature using an SSD as the main and another for the cache? Thank you again.
![]()
Philips
October 05, 2011 at 2:13pm
Thank you for the information shared. This is a bunch. This is to be well kept in mind.
![]()
iceman08
July 16, 2011 at 5:58pm
I know its an older article, but will z68 boards support Ivy Bridge?
![]()
stevenbatl
May 23, 2011 at 11:25am
Reading this article gives me the impression that you can install the SSD for caching later. Is that possible? When initially setting up the PC with one drive, would I have to set the controller to RAID or would I start out with AHCI and then change it to RAID when I'm ready to add the SSD?
![]()
maleficarus™
May 15, 2011 at 1:13pm
Even though I made a comment about this chipset not being that exciting I went and bought the Asus P8Z68-V PRO regardless as I was looking to upgrade anyway. Nice board!!
![]()
Dave_MaxPC
May 11, 2011 at 2:59pm
Perhaps I missed the comparison, but is there much of a difference between having a SSD as the primary drive with OS installed and HDD as secondary drive vs. the primary drive being the HDD while the SSD is dedicated to the SRT? It seems intuitive to me it would still make sense to just have the SSD as the OS drive unless I'm missing something. Or does it only make sense if your SSD isn't big enough to be the primary OS drive?
![]()
gordonung
May 13, 2011 at 9:43am
Yes, the highest performnace willl always be from running a standalone SSD for primary boot/OS duties. The standard setup, SSD and secondary HDD, also doesn't have to cache anything to gain the performance of the SRT. Remember, you have to load it once for the SRT to cache it to the drive the first time. SRT is mostly intended for those who don't have large drives or can't afford them. A 240GB Vertex 3, while very nice, is still, what $500? However, I really do think SRT has utility for those who really don't like to have to deal with managing data.
![]()
Pball1224
May 11, 2011 at 12:09pm
It does not make sense to me why a power loss would cause data loss, this sounds like bad implementation of the technology to me. An SSD is persistent... why hasn't the setup been made smart enough so that upon system startup, if unwritten data exists in the SSD's write cache, then it is taken care of? I'm also curious why there's a 64GB cap, that's a little disapointing.
Now I wonder what would happen if someone set this up, and was also still trying to use win7's ReadyBoost, would win7 realize that pulling files from the HDD could actually be faster than the thumdrive, or would it still try to pull from the thumb drive? Something I'll probably never know the answer to...
![]()
win7fanboi
May 11, 2011 at 10:53am
Hmm.. Good point. I am sure the guys at Intel thought about this when they came up with the chipset but with write caching enabled they recommend that you use UPS. With SSD I wonder if there is a difference (advantage/disadvantage). Since it makes you switch to RAID I have a feeling that it will be more of a pain to recover your data if you have a powerloss/drive faliure. I could be wrong though. Also I don't know if the backup programs will work normally(especially the older version) since some let you create a partition, move stuff over and queue other operations, when you apply the changes it goes to work, reboots and grabs the drive before windows does. What if the SSD is trying to flush the changes to the drive but the file/folder is somehow locked. Please let us know if you find out more (although thanks to MPC I just finished my first build few weeks back - Sandy Bridge 2600K so am not looking to upgrade anytime soon).
Thanks
![]()
gordonung
May 13, 2011 at 9:37am
Here is the official response to your concern over file backups. It is as we thought, you are fine with any file-based backup tools that most of us run. If you run imaging-type backups, you'll need to run in Enhanced Mode, not Maximized Mode
"Intel® Smart Response Technology in either Enhanced or Maximized mode is fully compatible with backup tools that operate at the file system or volume level in Windows, or DOS. An example of this would be the Windows built-in backup tools. Standalone backup and disk imaging tools that boot versions of Linux and other operating systems that are not cache aware and therefore not compatible and should only be used with Intel® Smart Response Technology configured in Enhanced Mode."
![]()
gordonung
May 11, 2011 at 11:09am
Yes, you are correct. Recovering data would be a little more work then running a standard HDD-only or standard SSD only configuration. Let's say your machine's mobo blew up. To move your setup, you would have to move both the HDD and SSD that supports SRT to have a near uninterrupted recovery. With an HDD or SSD, you can drop it into any machine, reboot and hopefully Win7 will boot with the new hardware without a BSOD.
And yes, a UPS is recommended as having a power outage while it's syncing a few MB of data would be pretty bad. For those folks, the Enhanced mode is probably recommended.
![]()
win7fanboi
May 11, 2011 at 9:23am
I think the biggest potential issue with SRT was overlooked. Backup. Its great that your OS is on a mashup drive but what happens when you favorite backup player tried to perform backup and some files that were modified are in the cache? What about when you want to move to a bigger SSD and try to clone the SSD? Lot of unanswered question (I really haven't cared to research). I am sure there will be ways to perform a backup of the drive but I wouldn't be one of the first ones to jump in with both feet until I knew the answer to some of these questions.
![]()
gordonung
May 11, 2011 at 10:26am
I do not believe it would be an issue. You cannot directly access cached data directly. A backup, would ask for a file and the SRT/RST would hand over a file. If it's in the cache, great, it gets read faster. If not, it comes from the hard drive. I am checking with Intel but I'm pretty sure there is no issue with doing a backup. In other words, think of the cache in your hard drive. It has a 32MB or 64MB cache. There is no risk of anything getting out of sync.
![]()
Ryyan
May 11, 2011 at 4:10am
" Since the Vertex 3 is SATA 3Gb/s, we also made sure it was running off of the Intel PCH’s SATA 6GB/s controller."
![]()
d3v
May 11, 2011 at 2:01am
Isn't IPT a privacy risk?
I bet SSD caching will be mainstream in ivy bridge chipsets.
![]()
gordonung
May 11, 2011 at 10:35am
I'm not fully abrest of all of the IPT features but I do not think so. It's not like the aborted processor serial number on the Pentium III. I believe the CPU works with the chipset to generate random passwords that can be used as one-time passwords. So, when a web site or service asks you to generate a one-time password to be used along with your password, the CPU/chipset generates a random number which is used to authenticate who you are. So, let's say you go to your bank, it asks you for your normal log in plus your one-time password that can only be generated by your CPU/chipset. If someone stole your info, they still could not access your account.
I would only think that it is a privacy risk if all web sites could check your identity without asking which I don't believe is how IPT works.
Of course, I could be completely wrong about how IPT works.












