Download of the Week: Greenshot
I don't exactly know how often you take screenshots. As you might guess, I take a ton of screenshots--far more, on a weekly basis, than I'd ever care to take. But I'm not here to brag. I'm here to show you how you can take screenshots with greater detail and precision than the ol' default technique: Jamming print screen, saving a huge bitmap file, downloading an open-source photo editing program, cropping it, saving it, and... doing it all again.
Ugh.
Seriously though, that's the typical process I go through in order to snap pics of applications and what-have-you. A handy open-source application called Greenshot isn't the saving grace for my woes--and, yes, I realize there are more complete screen-shot-taking apps out there today--but it does provide an extra level of control that's a good step between "Print Screen" and Jing.
With Greenshot, one can use a simple combination of keyboard commands to define the size of the capture box immediately prior to Windows snapping the picture. That, or just use the default printscreen button--Greenshot transforms this from a full-screen capture into a region-defined capture, which you paint directly onto the screen as if you were drawing a box around a bunch of files.
Once you've snapped your shot, you can use the program's built-in image editor to further refine your final image. If you're confident in your snapping skills, however, you can also tell Greenshot to dump your initial capture into a file by default. And if neither of those sound very appealing, you can always just have to program resort to Windows' default technique--dumping your shot to the clipboard and calling it a night.

Each week, Maximum PC picks a new free or shareware download as its favorite of... the week. Have a nifty application that you can't live without? Twitter David Murphy @acererak with your latest suggestions.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
bingojubes
June 14, 2010 at 7:36am
I use Hypersnap, especially for pc specs, since alot of game forums require them forhelp, and its a pain to TYPE it out every time, so i just take menu/window shots and then upload them to sites like photobucket. i havent tried the snipping tool yet, myself.
![]()
titan8813
June 14, 2010 at 7:08am
I just use the Windows 7 Snipping Tool. Takes just a second to start up and has served my needs very well. But definitely keep the suggestions coming!
![]()
whr4usa
June 14, 2010 at 12:25pm
I was also going to mention this
fell in love with SnipIt in Vista!
SnipIt + original Paint.NET or GIMPShop + Windows Live & Windows 7 multiMedia components == amazing
when ingame amazing == xfire
![]()
Mighty BOB!
June 14, 2010 at 3:45pm
^ This guy knows. Alt+PrtScr. Of course simple clipboard and screenshot apps have more functions, but I don't really need them.
![]()
Belboz99
June 14, 2010 at 12:27am
Always use .png as the file format when taking screenshots. JPEG has a way of blending nearby pixels, thus a nice bright red font such as on Max PC becomes dull brick red, and it looses it's crispness and sharpness.
As an added bonus, PNG can take less space, depending on how many colors are used and how much "detail" is in the image. For example, a screenshot of terminal window can weigh under 10KB without an issue.
As an Aside, Ubuntu and most other Linux distro's ship with far better screenshot capabilities than any version of Windows. :P
Edit: Check out the difference between these two screenshots:
PNG: http://tinyurl.com/37yx5jy
JPG: http://tinyurl.com/2u3hax6
Especially watch the red colored "New".
Dan O.
![]()
Peanut Fox
June 14, 2010 at 11:05am
The PNG looks better than either of the two JPEG shots by a good margin in image quality speak. The degree of difference you can see may lie in the monitor you view it on.
![]()
Belboz99
June 14, 2010 at 8:13am
And I would argue that your JPEG still looks far inferior quality to my PNG any day of the week. Open them up in seperate tabs, then flip between them, you're blind if you can't see the difference. (Though being a photographer and having 3 years experience as a photo lab manager my eyes may just be tuned to such things. :P)
Edit:
BTW, my 44KB image defeats you're lesser quality 213KB image on file size alone!
![]()
Mighty BOB!
June 14, 2010 at 3:44pm
It depends on what you're going to use it for. If it's just a quick screenshot to show someone what menu button to click while you're helping them with something, then it doesn't really matter. Of course if you're showing off your photography portfolio, then yes you definitely want something that doesn't have a lot of nasty lossy compression artifacts.
![]()
Belboz99
June 14, 2010 at 8:34pm
Actually, it's just the inverse...
JPG is ideal for photos, PNG is ideal for screenshots and other rendered graphics. You wouldn't want to post a photo you took on your vacation in PNG because the file size would be enormous. Similary, you wouldn't want to post a graphic such as a screenshot or button for a website in JPEG because the compression wasn't meant for graphics, it was meant for photos.
It's about using the right tool for the right job, don't use a screwdriver to pound a nail, and don't use a hammer to drive a screw!
Dan O.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.
















